Textmagic Vs. Text Request

See how Textmagic compares to Text Request in terms of features and more

Book a Demo

How does Textmagic compare to Text Request?

Textmagic LogoTextMagic Icon Logo
text-request-logotext-request-logo-small

Usage

Omni-Channel Inbox

Contacts & Custom Data Objects

Campaigns (Mass Messaging)

Basic Workflow Automation

Advanced Workflow Automation

Popular Add-ons

API & Developer Portal

ATS/CRM Integrations

Reporting & Analytics

Support & Permissions

Other Premium Products

*Last updated on 30 July 2024

Pros and Cons of Textmagic

Pros

  • TextMagic has been around since 2004 and has a lot of experience in the sms space.
  • TextMagic has a pay per text option which can be cost effective for smaller teams without a regular need for texting.

Cons

  • Outdated user interface: Some users report that the UI feels outdated, although it's still functional.
  • Mobile app limitations: The mobile app has fewer features compared to the web version.
  • Customer support issues: Some users have reported unresponsive customer service, though this isn't a universal experience.

Pros and Cons of Text Request

Pros

  • TextRequest is established in the SMS space and has been around for many years.
  • TextRequest is great for small teams who need manual 1-1 messaging and a payments integration.

Cons

  • Message organization issues. It can be difficult to fully close or archive messages that are no longer relevant.
  • Notification issues. Occasionally, message notifications can get lost or overlooked.
  • Poor mobile functionality. Some users report difficulty composing new messages to current clients on mobile devices

Frequently Asked Questions

Textmagic Vs...

Select to see how Textmagic compares to other services

Want to automate your communication?

Book a demo and see how easy it is to integrate Whippy with your existing systems.