Text-em-all Vs. Text Request
See how Text-em-all compares to Text Request in terms of features and more
Book a DemoHow does Text-em-all compare to Text Request?
Usage
Omni-Channel Inbox
Contacts & Custom Data Objects
Campaigns (Mass Messaging)
Basic Workflow Automation
Advanced Workflow Automation
Popular Add-ons
API & Developer Portal
ATS/CRM Integrations
Reporting & Analytics
Support & Permissions
Other Premium Products
*Last updated on 13 September 2024
Pros and Cons of Text-em-all
Pros
- Text Em All is an established player in the sms communication space.
- Text Em All have a pay as you go option which can be useful for businesses who don't have an ongoing use case.
Cons
- Text Em All's per message fee is considered quite high.
- While Text Em All is an established player they lack a lot of key automation features, meaning responding to campaigns can be tedious and time consuming for your teams.
- Text em all have a relatively basic mobile app experience which can make it difficult to do work on the go.
Pros and Cons of Text Request
Pros
- TextRequest is established in the SMS space and has been around for many years.
- TextRequest is great for small teams who need manual 1-1 messaging and a payments integration.
Cons
- Message organization issues. It can be difficult to fully close or archive messages that are no longer relevant.
- Notification issues. Occasionally, message notifications can get lost or overlooked.
- Poor mobile functionality. Some users report difficulty composing new messages to current clients on mobile devices
Frequently Asked Questions
Want to automate your communication?
Book a demo and see how easy it is to integrate Whippy with your existing systems.