Text-em-all Vs. Text Request

See how Text-em-all compares to Text Request in terms of features and more

Book a Demo

How does Text-em-all compare to Text Request?

text-em-all-logotext-em-all-logo-small
text-request-logotext-request-logo-small

Usage

Omni-Channel Inbox

Contacts & Custom Data Objects

Campaigns (Mass Messaging)

Basic Workflow Automation

Advanced Workflow Automation

Popular Add-ons

API & Developer Portal

ATS/CRM Integrations

Reporting & Analytics

Support & Permissions

Other Premium Products

*Last updated on 13 September 2024

Pros and Cons of Text-em-all

Pros

  • Text Em All is an established player in the sms communication space.
  • Text Em All have a pay as you go option which can be useful for businesses who don't have an ongoing use case.

Cons

  • Text Em All's per message fee is considered quite high.
  • While Text Em All is an established player they lack a lot of key automation features, meaning responding to campaigns can be tedious and time consuming for your teams.
  • Text em all have a relatively basic mobile app experience which can make it difficult to do work on the go.

Pros and Cons of Text Request

Pros

  • TextRequest is established in the SMS space and has been around for many years.
  • TextRequest is great for small teams who need manual 1-1 messaging and a payments integration.

Cons

  • Message organization issues. It can be difficult to fully close or archive messages that are no longer relevant.
  • Notification issues. Occasionally, message notifications can get lost or overlooked.
  • Poor mobile functionality. Some users report difficulty composing new messages to current clients on mobile devices

Frequently Asked Questions

Text-em-all Vs...

Select to see how Text-em-all compares to other services

Want to automate your communication?

Book a demo and see how easy it is to integrate Whippy with your existing systems.