EZ Texting Vs. Text Request
See how EZ Texting compares to Text Request in terms of features and more
Book a DemoHow does EZ Texting compare to Text Request?
Usage
Omni-Channel Inbox
Contacts & Custom Data Objects
Campaigns (Mass Messaging)
Basic Workflow Automation
Advanced Workflow Automation
Popular Add-ons
API & Developer Portal
ATS/CRM Integrations
Reporting & Analytics
Support & Permissions
Other Premium Products
*Last updated on 30 August 2024
Pros and Cons of EZ Texting
Pros
- Established SMS marketing service with a focus on text messaging
- Offers a "Start for Free" option with fast registration
Cons
- Limited communication channels: Primarily focuses on SMS, while Whippy offers a more comprehensive omni-channel approach including SMS, email, and other messaging channels
- Less advanced automation: EZ Texting's automation capabilities are more basic compared to Whippy's complex, multi-step Workflow Automations
- Narrower integration ecosystem: While EZ Texting offers some integrations, Whippy provides a more extensive range of integrations with CRMs, ATSs, and industry-specific software
- Potentially less flexible for diverse business needs: EZ Texting is more focused on SMS marketing, while Whippy offers a broader range of communication tools
Pros and Cons of Text Request
Pros
- TextRequest is established in the SMS space and has been around for many years.
- TextRequest is great for small teams who need manual 1-1 messaging and a payments integration.
Cons
- Message organization issues. It can be difficult to fully close or archive messages that are no longer relevant.
- Notification issues. Occasionally, message notifications can get lost or overlooked.
- Poor mobile functionality. Some users report difficulty composing new messages to current clients on mobile devices
Frequently Asked Questions
Want to automate your communication?
Book a demo and see how easy it is to integrate Whippy with your existing systems.